Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.

On Wed, 28 May 2025 23:49:56 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>

On Wed, 28 May 2025 21:28:26 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
>

On Wed, 28 May 2025 21:10:53 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>

On Wed, 28 May 2025 20:59:48 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
>

The MMX actually showed light speed variance as Arindam explained in
2005.
Aether is an infinitely fine elastic solid permeating the infinite
universe.
Electrons and protons glide through it without loss of momentum as it is
infinitely fine.
>
--

Aetherists point out that the MMX showed 25% of the 30 km/sec.

No idea what that means.

>
In vacuum interferometers there is absolutely no sign of light speed
variance.

>
You mean they did MMX outside the solar system?  Arindam has explained
the bungle involved back in 2005 for MMX on moving Earth. As the Earth
moves in aether the light speed must be variant.

>
Outer space has a finer vacuum than in an artificial vacuum.
>
The MMX aether was an elastic medium.
>
Just what could the medium for light in space be?
>
Light is a wave so there must be a medium. But exactly what?

>
--

The MMX showed 25% of ghe expected aether wind from the Earth's orbital
speed.
>
They have done vacuum interferometers on Earth and do not register even
the 25%.
>
Where does Arindam explain that bungle? How can there be no aether wind?

>
See Arindam's 2005 paper. Should be in one of the links.
>

MMX aether was stationary.

>
MMX was a bungle. We all pass through aether but we cannot find our
speed in it. Light speed is variant like all kinetic.

>
With all the advances in physics over 100 years we must have found
something that would function as an aether.

>
Aether has got many properties like permittivity and permeability,
infinitely fine and infinitely elastic.
>
Physics has regressed abominable. Arindam has put it back on its tracks
by updating Newton's laws
>
--