Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.
De : relativity (at) *nospam* paulba.no (Paul.B.Andersen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 30. May 2025, 20:42:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <101d1bq$l2jh$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Den 30.05.2025 00:08, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 19:31:57 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
 
Den 27.05.2025 17:49, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
On Tue, 27 May 2025 9:37:57 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>
Den 27.05.2025 05:27, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
Particle wave duality is no longer accepted as it has been
experimentally disproven.
>
>
"Did We Get the Double Slit Experiment All Wrong?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpMcC-E5l5c
>
Light is a wave and not a particle.

 She disagreed with the article, saying the dark photons have no energy,
unlike particles.
This is what "she" in the video said about the new theory:
"Honestly when I read the headline, I thought this is bullshit.
  But having read the paper I think it's a matter of framing.
  This is a genuinely interesting new way to think about an old
  experiment. But I don't think that talking about dark states
  of light is going to make quantum physics any less confusing."
This means that she accept the "new theory" as a possibly
valid alternative theory to QED.
That may be so, but if it is valid, it would have to predict
the same as QED for any experiment.
I think the world will stick to QED.
In either case, in quantum field theories, light is a particle.
------------------
But remember that a theory of physics is a mathematical model
of Nature, it is not the Nature.
In QED light is a particle.
In Maxwell's theory, light is a wave.
There is no duality in either of the theories.
QED has a broader field of applicability than Maxwell,
it predicts some phenomena Maxwell doesn't.
(e.g. photon-electron interactions)
But the telecommunication we now are using to communicate
is made possible because of Maxwell.
So it is OK to consider light to be a wave according to Maxwell
in some cases. So if you are designing a radio link, Maxwell
is the theory to use,
But there is no way a wave can excite an electron to a higher
energy level, only particles can do that.
QED can predict that a LED will emit light.
Maxwell can't.
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 May 25 * Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.110LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.58Paul.B.Andersen
27 May 25 i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.57LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 i +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Ross Finlayson
27 May 25 i +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Leolin Baboshkin
29 May 25 i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.54Paul.B.Andersen
29 May 25 i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.47LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 i  i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.46Paul.B.Andersen
30 May 25 i  i +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 i  i i`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Paul.B.Andersen
31 May 25 i  i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.43Maciej Woźniak
31 May 25 i  i  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.42rhertz
31 May 25 i  i   +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.39LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Jun 25 i  i   i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.38Paul.B.Andersen
1 Jun 25 i  i   i +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Paul.B.Andersen
1 Jun 25 i  i   i i`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Ross Finlayson
1 Jun 25 i  i   i +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Maciej Woźniak
1 Jun 25 i  i   i +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.7LaurenceClarkCrossen
4 Jun 25 i  i   i i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.6Paul.B.Andersen
4 Jun 25 i  i   i i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.5Maciej Woźniak
4 Jun 25 i  i   i i  +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Jhon Dobrenkov
16 Jun 25 i  i   i i  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Jun 25 i  i   i i   `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jun 25 i  i   i i    `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Maciej Woźniak
2 Jun 25 i  i   i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.27Thomas Heger
2 Jun 25 i  i   i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3Athel Cornish-Bowden
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Thomas Heger
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  i `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Athel Cornish-Bowden
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.18Thomas Heger
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  i+- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Athel Cornish-Bowden
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  i+* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.10Athel Cornish-Bowden
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  ii+* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.8Thomas Heger
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.7J. J. Lodder
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Elick Tulaev
5 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.5Thomas Heger
5 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4J. J. Lodder
5 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii   +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Emory Batsanov
8 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii   `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Thomas Heger
8 Jun 25 i  i   i  iii    `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Darin Patrianakos
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  ii`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Thomas Heger
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.6Thomas Heger
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.5J. J. Lodder
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Python
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i  i`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Raikhlin Balabanov
7 Jun 25 i  i   i  i  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Thomas Heger
7 Jun 25 i  i   i  i   `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Osmani Babakhanov
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4Paul.B.Andersen
3 Jun 25 i  i   i  i+- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Bobauk Bakharev
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Thomas Heger
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  i `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Paul.B.Andersen
4 Jun 25 i  i   i  `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Bertitaylor
31 May 25 i  i   +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
31 May 25 i  i   `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Baldemar Pokhojaev
29 May 25 i  +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 i  i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3Paul.B.Andersen
30 May 25 i  i +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 i  i `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i  +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i  `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.7Ross Finlayson
27 May 25 i+* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.5LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 ii`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4Ross Finlayson
29 May 25 ii `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 ii  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Ross Finlayson
30 May 25 ii   `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 i`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
27 May 25 +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.20Bertitaylor
27 May 25 i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.19LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 May 25 i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.18Bertitaylor
28 May 25 i  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.17LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 May 25 i   `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.16Bertitaylor
28 May 25 i    `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.15LaurenceClarkCrossen
28 May 25 i     `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.14Bertitaylor
28 May 25 i      +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Bertitaylor
29 May 25 i      `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.12LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i       `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.11Bertitaylor
29 May 25 i        +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i        `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.9LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i         `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.8Bertitaylor
29 May 25 i          +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.5Bertitaylor
29 May 25 i          i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 i          i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3Bertitaylor
30 May 25 i          i  `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
2 Jun 25 i          i   `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1bertitaylor
29 May 25 i          `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Jun 25 i           `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Bertietaylor
28 May 25 +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.10Thomas Heger
28 May 25 i+* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.8LaurenceClarkCrossen
30 May 25 ii`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.7Thomas Heger
30 May 25 ii +- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Felierix Babaev
31 May 25 ii +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.4Thomas Heger
31 May 25 ii i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3LaurenceClarkCrossen
1 Jun 25 ii i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.2Thomas Heger
1 Jun 25 ii i  `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Jerrold Kalistratov
1 Jun 25 ii `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i`- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1Kennon Babashov
28 May 25 +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.12Mikko
28 May 25 i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.11LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i +* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.7Mikko
29 May 25 i i`* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.6LaurenceClarkCrossen
29 May 25 i `* Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.3Ross Finlayson
30 May 25 `- Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.1x

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal