Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.

On Sat, 31 May 2025 14:33:10 +0000, rhertz wrote:

On Sat, 31 May 2025 4:44:04 +0000, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
>

On 5/30/2025 7:31 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>

>
Didn't you know that it is experimental evidence
that determines the validity of a theory?\

>
Paul, only idiots as incompetent as you
are can believe such a nonsensical lie.

>
>
Paul is only 85% of an incompetent idiot. He's a relativist now. He
used,
by 1990, a rather competent EE. Then, the relativity doctrine and cult
ruined him, because his current mind is married with Deductive Method,
like what the Cretin used.
>
** Deductive science, or deductive reasoning, is a logical process that
moves from general principles to specific conclusions or predictions.
>
** Inductive science or reasoning: goes from specific observations to
general conclusions.
>
In science, deductive reasoning is used to test hypotheses, where a
general rule or theory is applied to a specific situation to see if the
prediction holds true.
>
Newton, Maxwell, and all the greatest scientists that have ever lived:
INDUCTION.
>
All the cretins since Einstein: DEDUCTION or, as some Germans said:
Jewish science.
>
Planck, the father of quantum physics, all that he wanted in life was to
be a theoretical physicist (hence, a inductive based guy). But,
IRONICALLY, his greatest achievement in life was based on DEDUCTION.
Without the prior work of Wien and the works of the experimental
physicists from the German PTB, that created solid data and from it,
basic theories (Wien), Planck would never could have written his
foundational paper in December 1900.
>
Induction driven parasitic cretins, starting around 1902, created a
fantasy useless world, that we are suffering now (120 years in a row).
>
The most influential people in the last 120 years, which CREATED the
modern world, have been DEDUCTIVE PEOPLE. like: Boole, de Forest, Tesla,
Shockley, Townes,
Schawlow, Kapany, Kilby, Gates, wozniak, Jobs, etc.
>
>
Paul belongs to the specie of retarded people, who blindly believe in
INDUCTION.
>
>
What he wrote is just PLAIN WRONG, because he's an imbecile narcissist.

You appear to have accidentally inverted the two words at the end.
Deductive reasoning is prone to confirmation bias.
GR does not make a valid prediction for a doubling of the Newtonian
deflection. For one thing Huygens principle wouldn't apply to
gravitational influence on particles but that is what Einstein invoked
for his doubling. Curved space cannot explain causation as it boils down
to pure reification fallacy. Space time diagrams can curve yet they
cannot cause space to curve. They only describe trajectories.