Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
De : clzb93ynxj (at) *nospam* att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 17. Jun 2025, 04:45:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <65da7924c180b3fe7b1564c361755fe4@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 18:24:11 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>
Mass does not change with variations of gravity.
Inertial mass is equivalent to gravitational mass.
Therefore, mass does not change with velocity.
>
There is no 'mass-velocity relation'.
(except as a figure of speech)
>
There is nothing to disprove.
>
Jan
If you had anything on the ball or anything to bring to the table you
could have offered this argument given by Van Flandern:
"The Einstein Hoax" book p.306= "SR establishes that kinetic energy
possesses inertial mass"; "Since the ratio of gravitational mass to
inertial mass of various materials has been found to be identical to a
high degree of accuracy, it is to be expected that kinetic energy which
is bound to matter will be affected by the gravitational field to the
same degree as is the energy associated with the rest mass. This
conclusion follows from the fact that different portions of the rest
mass of various materals consists of the mass imposed by kinetic energy.
This kinetic energy is contained, for example, in the kinetic energy of
electrons in their orbits, the thermal motion of atoms, and perhaps in
the resonance states of nuclear particles."
This argument fails because mass does not vary in different
gravitational fields.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Jun 25 * The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven16LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 +* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven9J. J. Lodder
15 Jun 25 i+- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 i+- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 i+- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 i+* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven4LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Jun 25 ii`* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven3Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jun 25 ii `* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven2LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Jun 25 ii  `- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jun 25 i`- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Jun 25 +* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven3Mikko
27 Jun 25 i`* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven2LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Jul10:44 i `- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1Mikko
19 Jun 25 `* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven3Richard Hachel
20 Jun 25  `* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven2Mikko
20 Jun 25   `- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1Jonatan Babanov

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal