Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven

Liste des GroupesRevenir à p relativity 
Sujet : Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven
De : rh (at) *nospam* tiscali.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 19. Jun 2025, 19:01:55
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <GgK3A7Su1qNY5W8IcGOxH65b-Fo@jntp>
References : 1
User-Agent : Nemo/1.0
Le 15/06/2025 à 18:19, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit :
Mass does not change with variations of gravity.
Inertial mass is equivalent to gravitational mass.
Therefore, mass does not change with velocity.
Mass is a relativistic invariant.
Dr. Richard Hachel said: "One hippopotamus does not become two hippopotamuses by changing the frame of reference."
If mass were a relativistic variant, the energy of a body would become
E=2mc².sqrt(1+Vr²/c²).
Everyone knows this is false, and that E=mc².sqrt(1+Vr²/c²).
So, no.
Mass is an invariant.
It's strange, moreover, that idiotic scientists still write: m'=m/sqrt(1-v²/c²).
This is ridiculous and false.
It is energy that is relative to velocity, not mass.
R.H.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Jun 25 * The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven16LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 +* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven9J. J. Lodder
15 Jun 25 i+- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 i+- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 i+- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
15 Jun 25 i+* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven4LaurenceClarkCrossen
16 Jun 25 ii`* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven3Paul.B.Andersen
16 Jun 25 ii `* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven2LaurenceClarkCrossen
18 Jun 25 ii  `- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1Paul.B.Andersen
17 Jun 25 i`- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1LaurenceClarkCrossen
17 Jun 25 +* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven3Mikko
27 Jun 25 i`* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven2LaurenceClarkCrossen
3 Jul10:44 i `- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1Mikko
19 Jun 25 `* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven3Richard Hachel
20 Jun 25  `* Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven2Mikko
20 Jun 25   `- Re: The Mass Velocity Relation Definitively Disproven1Jonatan Babanov

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal