Liste des Groupes | Revenir à p relativity |
LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:"9.4- It is because the solution of a problem in Tensor Calculus
>On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 20:32:43 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:ense.html
>LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:Anyone desiring to judge for themselves can get a free pdf:
>On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 18:37:08 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:>
>LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:As usual you give no good reason for your opinion.
>On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 10:36:39 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:>
>Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> wrote:
>On 15/06/2025 09:25, J. J. Lodder wrote:>LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:>
>On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 20:00:42 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:>
>"AI: "The Einstein Hoax: The Disastrous Intellectual War on CommonReading it I find that it certainly seems like it must be Van
Sense" is a book by Tom Van Flandern that critiques Albert
Einstein's theories, particularly relativity."
>
It is published under the pen name H. E. Retic, as explained in the
About the Author section, where he describes Van Flandern's career.
Flandern's and it's copyright 1997.
Do you have verifiable evidence
for H. E. Retic being Tom van Flandern?
I wouldn't want to lose you (am I wrong?), but could you please
stop feeding the spammers?
The book: "The Einstein Hoax: The Disastrous Intellectual War on Common
Sense" by H. E. Retic obviously exists.
(you can order it on Amazon for example,
but I won't spend real money on it)
>
So I would like to see the About the Author section,
to see if the claim that he is Van Flandern is justified.
>
One never knows, even LaurenceClarkCrossen may provide
some useful information, once in a while,
>
Jan
>
BTW, Van Flandern admitted later on that his anti-relativity claims
based on Voyager data didn't hold water.
There has been a lot of discussion on it in the other SPR,
when that group still had worthwhile content."About the Author...retired Mechanical Engineer who graduated from>
Cornell University in 1948...designed and built the stable platform of
the inertial guidance system used in the X-15 aircraft...designed for
sale to the Navy the first Low-Light level Television System capable of
operating from full daylight to the photon noise limit threshold without
picture degradation...a goal that the Night Vision Laboratory at Ft.
Belvoir had declared impossible...holds over 25 patents and in one year
was granted 10% of the patents issued to a major military
contractor...began to study gravitation in the mid 1960's..."
Thanks. And OK, that settles it.
This 'H. E. Retic' is definitely not Tom Van Flandern.
Just another dime a dozen dumb engineer.
>
Why is it that some of those engineers think
that they know everything about everything,
which qualifies them to disprove any scientific theory they don't like,
like evolution or relativity?
>
Jan
I did. Comparison of the Author description
with the wikiparticle on Tom Van Flandern
makes it obvious that the two don't fit together,
>
Jan
https://epdf.pub/the-einstein-hoax-the-disastrous-intellectual-war-on-common-sIt has 16 chapters without the appendixes.>
Cowardly evasions.
YOU claimed something, it is up to YOU
to make it at least a bit plausible,
>
Jan
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.