Re: The old definition of second is winning against SI idiocy

Le 28/06/2025 à 23:29, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :

On 6/28/2025 9:22 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
 > Den 27.06.2025 10:34, skrev Maciej Woźniak:
 >> On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
 >>
 >>  > GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
 >>  > so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
 >>  > to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
 >>
 >> That's right - the clocks made for serious measurements
 >> are adjusted (calibrated) to count seconds of 1/86400
 >> of a mean solar day.
 >
 > Quite right.
 > The GPS-SV clocks are indeed made for serious measurements.
 > And the designers of the GPS understood that they
 > had to adjust the clocks down by ((1 - 4.4647e-10) \
 > The Galileo-SV clocks are also made for serious measurements.
 > And the designers of the Galileo GNSS understood that they
 > had to adjust the clocks down by ((1 - 4.7218e-10) to
 > make the SV-clock stay in sync with UTC and would have
 > measured 86400 seconds in a mean solar day.
 >
 > The GLONASS-SV clocks are also made for serious measurements.
 > And the designers of GLONASS understood that they
 > had to adjust the clocks down by ((1 - 4.3582e-10) to
 > make the SV-clock stay in sync with UTC and would have
 > measured 86400 seconds in a mean solar day.
>
>
Summarizing - for serious measurement
we have to rely on the  old second
instead that mad nonsense your bunch of
idiots is insisting on.
QED.
>
BTW, you really should learn some basics.
UTC, TAI, GPS time - they're similar but
slightly different (and, of course, none
of them dilates).

 Why did you snipped this ? Cannot answer ?

 ‹ You know of course why the SV-clocks made for serious measurements
in the different GNSS systems have to be adjusted differently.