Re: The first postulate is a truism.

Am Montag000030, 30.06.2025 um 17:31 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden:

On 2025-06-30 12:15:05 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
 

Am Sonntag000029, 29.06.2025 um 10:03 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden:

On 2025-06-29 04:20:02 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
>

Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 19:18 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden:

On 2025-06-28 16:22:06 +0000, Thomas Heger said:
>

>
[ … ]

>

>
Well, that's what you think.
>
For me it seems, that Heaviside and Gibbs were 'con-artists' and wanted to divert physics from true science.
...

>
I don't know enough about Heaviside to comment on what you say about him (though my guess is that it's complete bollocks to rival the complete bollocks that you write on other subjects). For Gibbs, however, it's clear that you don't know the first thing about Gibbs's character. A good place to start would be the Wikiparticle on Gibbs, but there is plenty to be learned from other sources.
>

>
My guess was, that Gibbs and Heaviside cooperated in the attempt to eliminate quaternions.

>
Instead of guessing, why not try to find out?

>
Conspiracies are necessarily a secret.
>
So you cannot evaluate your guesses that easily.
>
But in my case I was also hindered by 'late birth'.
...

 My guess is that "Thomas Heger" is a made-up name for someone working for Vladimir Putin to gather information about people posting to this group. My evidence for this? None whatsoever, but what does that matter?
 

I could easily prove, that my real name is really 'Thomas Heger' and that I live in Berlin, Germany and do not work for Putin or Russia in any way.
I'm actually participating in UseNet discussions much langer than Putin is president of Russia, but mainly in other topics than physics.
But somehow I don't want to provide any proof about my identity, because real names in UseNet-groups are already rare.
Therefore, you may think whatever you like, but should take my word, that I'm not a Russian agent.
TH