Sujet : Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic comp.ai.philosophyDate : 27. Jun 2025, 19:11:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <103mms8$9qtq$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/27/2025 12:27 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[ Followup-To: set ]
In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
[ .... ]
I know that DDD .... simulated by HHH cannot
possibly reach its own simulated "return" statement
final halt state because the execution trace
conclusively proves this.
Everybody else knows this, too, and nobody has said otherwise. The
conclusion is that the simulation by HHH is incorrect.
It is impossible for anyone to gaslight me on this because
the execution trace conclusively proves that I am correct.
*ChatGPT, Gemini and Grok all agree*
DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach
its simulated "return" statement final halt state.
https://chatgpt.com/share/685ed9e3-260c-8011-91d0-4dee3ee08f46https://gemini.google.com/app/f2527954a959bce4https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMg%3D%3D_b750d0f1-9996-4394-b0e4-f76f6c77df3d -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method
Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method