Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)

On 12/7/2024 6:18 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 12/7/24 6:32 AM, olcott wrote:

On 12/6/2024 9:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:

On 12/6/2024 8:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 12/6/24 9:08 PM, olcott wrote:

On 12/5/2024 11:20 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:

Am 05.12.2024 um 05:20 schrieb olcott:

There is an 80% chance that I will be alive in one month.
There may be an extended pause in my comments.
I will try to bring a computer to the out of town hospital.

>
Maybe you'll solve your halting problem issues before you die.
>

>
typedef void (*ptr)();
int HHH(ptr P);
>
int DD()
{
    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
    if (Halt_Status)
      HERE: goto HERE;
    return Halt_Status;
}
>
int main()
{
    HHH(DD);
}
>
>
I am sure that DD correctly emulated by HHH according to
the semantics of the C programming language cannot possibly
reach its own return instruction final halt state.

>
How does HHH correctly emulated DD, if it isn't give tne code for the
HHH that DD calls?
>

>
As I have told you many dozens of times HHH and DD share
the same global memory space within memory version of the
Halt7.obj file.
>

>
And thus you admit that your HHH isn’t the required “pure function” as its
result is dependent on that contents of that global memory, and not just
its input, as required by the definition of a global function,
>

>
First we have to acknowledge that pure function or not HHH does something unprecedented in the history of the halting problem:
HHH does correctly reject its input as non-halting.

 No, it doesn't do anything "unprecedented".
 

Changing the subject to a different criteria
IS CHEATING USING THE STRAWMAN DECEPTION
Try and show any example of any prior work such that
the termination analyzer does return the correct termination
value where the measure of the behavior of DD is DD emulated
by HHH according to the semantics of the x86 language.
Changing the subject to a different criteria
IS CHEATING USING THE STRAWMAN DECEPTION
HHH can also be based on a C language interpreter or a UTM
as long as it gets the same result for the same criteria.
Changing the subject to a different criteria
IS CHEATING USING THE STRAWMAN DECEPTION
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer