Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method

Liste des GroupesRevenir à c theory 
Sujet : Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method
De : acm (at) *nospam* muc.de (Alan Mackenzie)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic sci.math
Suivi-à : comp.theory
Date : 27. Jun 2025, 18:27:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : muc.de e.V.
Message-ID : <103mkan$111i$1@news.muc.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : tin/2.6.4-20241224 ("Helmsdale") (FreeBSD/14.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64))
[ Followup-To: set ]

In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:

[ .... ]

I know that DDD .... simulated by HHH cannot
possibly reach its own simulated "return" statement
final halt state because the execution trace
conclusively proves this.

Everybody else knows this, too, and nobody has said otherwise.  The
conclusion is that the simulation by HHH is incorrect.

That no one else can possibly provide a correct
execution trace that refutes this means there has
been no actual rebuttal.

Dream on.

--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).


Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jun 25 * Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method117Alan Mackenzie
26 Jun 25 `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method116olcott
27 Jun 25  +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method95olcott
29 Jun 25  i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method94Mikko
29 Jun 25  i +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method92olcott
29 Jun 25  i i+* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method13olcott
30 Jun 25  i ii+* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method11Richard Damon
30 Jun 25  i iii`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method10olcott
30 Jun 25  i iii `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method9Richard Damon
30 Jun 25  i iii  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method8olcott
1 Jul 25  i iii   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method7Richard Damon
1 Jul 25  i iii    +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method5olcott
1 Jul 25  i iii    i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method4Richard Damon
1 Jul 25  i iii    i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method3olcott
2 Jul 25  i iii    i  +- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Richard Damon
2 Jul 25  i iii    i  `- Logic proves that Peter Olcott is just a liar.1Richard Damon
2 Jul 25  i iii    `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Richard Heathfield
30 Jun 25  i ii`- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Mikko
30 Jun 25  i i+* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method77Richard Damon
1 Jul 25  i ii`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method76Richard Damon
1 Jul 25  i ii +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method8olcott
1 Jul 25  i ii i+* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method4Fred. Zwarts
1 Jul 25  i ii ii`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method3olcott
2 Jul 25  i ii ii +- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Richard Damon
2 Jul 25  i ii ii `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Fred. Zwarts
1 Jul 25  i ii i`* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method3Richard Damon
1 Jul 25  i ii i `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method2olcott
2 Jul 25  i ii i  `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Richard Damon
3 Jul 25  i ii `* HHH(DDD)==0 is correct67olcott
3 Jul 25  i ii  +* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct36Mikko
3 Jul 25  i ii  i`* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct35olcott
3 Jul 25  i ii  i +- Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct1Richard Damon
4 Jul08:35  i ii  i `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct33Mikko
4 Jul13:50  i ii  i  `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct32olcott
4 Jul14:22  i ii  i   +* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct11joes
4 Jul14:32  i ii  i   i`* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct10olcott
4 Jul18:48  i ii  i   i `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct9Richard Damon
4 Jul19:24  i ii  i   i  `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct8olcott
4 Jul21:33  i ii  i   i   `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct7Richard Damon
4 Jul23:17  i ii  i   i    `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct6olcott
5 Jul08:36  i ii  i   i     +* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct2Fred. Zwarts
5 Jul17:07  i ii  i   i     i`- Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct1olcott
5 Jul14:01  i ii  i   i     `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct3Richard Damon
5 Jul17:16  i ii  i   i      `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct2olcott
6 Jul01:25  i ii  i   i       `- Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct1Richard Damon
4 Jul14:23  i ii  i   +* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct19Richard Damon
4 Jul15:43  i ii  i   i`* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct18olcott
4 Jul19:14  i ii  i   i `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct17Richard Damon
4 Jul19:25  i ii  i   i  `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct16olcott
4 Jul21:40  i ii  i   i   `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct15Richard Damon
4 Jul23:24  i ii  i   i    `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct14olcott
5 Jul08:33  i ii  i   i     +* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct3Fred. Zwarts
5 Jul17:03  i ii  i   i     i`* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct2olcott
6 Jul10:45  i ii  i   i     i `- Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct1Fred. Zwarts
5 Jul14:07  i ii  i   i     `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct10Richard Damon
5 Jul17:21  i ii  i   i      `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct9olcott
6 Jul01:36  i ii  i   i       `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct8Richard Damon
6 Jul03:23  i ii  i   i        `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct7olcott
6 Jul03:59  i ii  i   i         `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct6Richard Damon
6 Jul05:06  i ii  i   i          `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct5olcott
6 Jul10:40  i ii  i   i           +- Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct1Fred. Zwarts
6 Jul12:48  i ii  i   i           `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct3Richard Damon
6 Jul16:08  i ii  i   i            `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct2olcott
6 Jul17:50  i ii  i   i             `- Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct1Richard Damon
5 Jul09:42  i ii  i   `- Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct1Mikko
3 Jul 25  i ii  `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct30Richard Damon
3 Jul 25  i ii   `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct29olcott
3 Jul 25  i ii    `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct28Richard Damon
3 Jul 25  i ii     `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct27olcott
3 Jul23:59  i ii      +* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct5Richard Damon
4 Jul00:15  i ii      i`* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct4olcott
4 Jul01:22  i ii      i `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct3Richard Damon
4 Jul01:36  i ii      i  `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct2olcott
4 Jul14:25  i ii      i   `- Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct1Richard Damon
4 Jul08:42  i ii      `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct21Mikko
4 Jul13:57  i ii       `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct20olcott
5 Jul08:30  i ii        +* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct16Fred. Zwarts
5 Jul16:59  i ii        i`* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct15olcott
6 Jul10:19  i ii        i `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct14Mikko
6 Jul16:00  i ii        i  `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct13olcott
6 Jul17:53  i ii        i   +- Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct1Richard Damon
7 Jul09:25  i ii        i   `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct11Mikko
7 Jul15:02  i ii        i    `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct10olcott
7 Jul23:32  i ii        i     +- Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct1Richard Damon
8 Jul08:35  i ii        i     `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct8Mikko
8 Jul15:16  i ii        i      `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct7olcott
9 Jul09:32  i ii        i       +* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct5Mikko
9 Jul13:45  i ii        i       i`* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct4olcott
10 Jul02:35  i ii        i       i +- Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct1Richard Damon
10 Jul10:09  i ii        i       i `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct2Mikko
10 Jul15:15  i ii        i       i  `- Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct1olcott
9 Jul12:18  i ii        i       `- Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct1Richard Damon
5 Jul09:44  i ii        `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct3Mikko
5 Jul16:53  i ii         `* Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct2olcott
6 Jul10:35  i ii          `- Re: HHH(DDD)==0 is correct1Fred. Zwarts
30 Jun 25  i i`- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Mikko
30 Jun 25  i `- Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method1Mikko
27 Jun 25  `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method20Richard Damon
27 Jun 25   `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method19olcott
27 Jun 25    `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method18Richard Damon
27 Jun 25     +* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method12olcott
27 Jun 25     `* Re: ChatGPT agrees that HHH refutes the standard halting problem proof method5olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal