Quine's "Word & Object"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s logic 
Sujet : Quine's "Word & Object"
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.math sci.logic
Date : 22. Mar 2025, 05:34:13
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <D3Wdna5Sf9VVoEP6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
Quine's "Word & Object"
Been leafing through Quine's Word & Object.
Have you had a chance to find a copy of this?
I suppose it's considered quite the tour de force
of, "modern logic", in a sense of logical positivism,
while as well Quine won't ever be quite pinned down
as to whether it's exactly, founded, say.
Do you read, Quine's "Word & Object"?
One thing I noticed is that it consistently and
always uses the standard, Oxford, serial comma.
Yet, that would go without saying, except that
its absence is considered erroneous and poor.
It's like, if you really think that comma doesn't
belong, why don't you just use none, and keep
going, until it just sort of results a grunt of assent
or dissent.
Of course "A Theory" has a "The Logic".

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Mar 25 * Quine's "Word & Object"10Ross Finlayson
23 Mar 25 `* Re: Quine's "Word & Object"9Ross Finlayson
23 Mar 25  `* There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")8Julio Di Egidio
23 Mar 25   +- Re: There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")1Julio Di Egidio
23 Mar 25   +- Re: There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")1Julio Di Egidio
23 Mar 25   `* Re: There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")5Ross Finlayson
23 Mar 25    `* Re: There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")4Julio Di Egidio
23 Mar 25     +- Re: There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")1Julio Di Egidio
23 Mar 25     `* Re: There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")2Ross Finlayson
23 Mar 25      `- Re: There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")1Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal