Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 09. Dec 2024, 13:03:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <b09445be167b757878741be04c87cf76d24d9786@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/9/24 4:04 AM, WM wrote:
On 08.12.2024 19:01, Jim Burns wrote:
You (WM) are considering
infinite dark.finite.cardinals,
which do not exist.
>
Then analysis is contradicted in set theory.
∀n ∈ ℕ: E(1)∩E(2)∩...∩E(n) = E(n).
The limit of the left-hand side is empty, the limit of the right-hand side is full, i.e. not empty.
I do not tolerate that.
Regards, WM
Because you don't understand the rules of real analysis, because of your lack of understanding.
By your logic, 1 equals 0, so your whole world has blown up into smithereens, taking your mind with it.
…