Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.logic sci.mathDate : 13. Aug 2024, 21:13:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v9gb89$1g5h$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/13/2024 9:07 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
WM used his keyboard to write :
Le 12/08/2024 à 19:23, Richard Damon a écrit :
On 8/12/24 9:50 AM, WM wrote:
>
What causes an exception: nₓ ∈ ℕ:
⅟nₓ > 0 without ⅟(nₓ+1) > 0 ?
>
The end of the positive axis.
>
Which, by the definition of the Natural Numbers, doesn't exist.
>
The end of the positive axis exists.
Right there where the negative axis begins?
Ahh! Touche. :^D
Well, lets say the real axis, or x axis if you will:
(...)<--(-1)<--(-0+)-->(+1)-->(...)
It's infinitely long... Notice the signed zero? lol. Fair enough?