Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality (integral equations)
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.logic sci.mathDate : 11. Aug 2024, 00:45:02
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <kimdnc0gNcv3Zir7nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 08/10/2024 03:34 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 8/8/2024 5:07 PM, Moebius wrote:
Am 09.08.2024 um 00:21 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
>
Sorry for any confusion. ;^o
>
*We* aren't confused, imho. Keep cool and try to learn from your
betters (knowledge wise). :-P
>
Yup! Agreed. :^)
Harry Bateman has an excellent 1910 survey of integral equations
as can be found on the Integral Equations Wiki page,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_equationhttps://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/94115#page/506/mode/1upOne could sit an entire mathematics degree
and not ever hear a word of the first thing about it.