Re: Replacement of Cardinality (infinite middle)

On 08/11/2024 09:10 AM, Moebius wrote:

Am 11.08.2024 um 06:20 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 8/10/2024 6:19 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 11.08.2024 um 02:55 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 8/10/2024 4:05 PM, Moebius wrote:

>

I guess, JB would say: "If we don't consider omega, we don't
consider omega." :-P

>
For some reason I am thinking of salad here...? ;^)

>
You won't agree? :-)

>
I can see a line, comprised of two n-ary points. They have a p0 and a
p1, yet there is an infinity between then. [etc. etc.]

>
And where do you see omega on that line? (Very ... VERY ... far away?)
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvQ6dasK614

Theory of Anne Elk.
"Theory of Anne Elk", is a Monty Python sketch, that once
had the cachet of "All Your Base Belong To Us", or, something
like "Best Sparta Remix", if not, "Double Rainbow", where in it,
ahem, ahem, Anne Elk purports to report of the breaking significance
of her theory, which is hers, of Brontosauri if not Brontosauruses,
which are: thin at one end, very very thick in the middle,
and thin again at the other end.
Then there's a brief report and not much more to say about it.
Camelot is a silly place, ..., let's not go there.
How do you see omega as the second constant after empty set
an inductive set in ZF? It's definitely not "all" infinity.