Re: Replacement of Cardinality

On 8/28/2024 4:48 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 8/28/24 8:55 AM, WM wrote:

Le 28/08/2024 à 04:08, Richard Damon a écrit :

On 8/27/24 3:29 PM, WM wrote:

Le 25/08/2024 à 23:28, Richard Damon a écrit :
>

Why do you say that it is "1000" states that are dark?

>
A joke. In fact ℵo states are dark.

>
Which since you logic doesn't allow you to complete, means he can't actually pass it.

>
He does pass. Enlighten the state where he passes. Fail.
>
Regards, WM

 And thus there is also no smallest unit fraction.
 Those two results go together.
 You are just blind to that because you have created your imaginary "darkness" to hide the fact that your logic doesn't actually work on these sets.

Right. No smallest unit fraction and no largest natural number. They are "related" in a sense because 1/n uses natural numbers. 1/0 is not a unit fraction. ;^)