Re: Replacement of Cardinality

On 8/30/2024 6:01 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 8/30/24 8:55 AM, WM wrote:

Le 29/08/2024 à 20:51, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :

On 8/29/2024 6:27 AM, WM wrote:

Le 29/08/2024 à 01:48, Richard Damon a écrit :

>

You just can't count them from the "end" that doesn't have an end.

>
Why not?

>
Because it does not have an end.

>
0 lies below the end. Hence there is an end, even if you cannot see it.
>
Regards, WM
>
>

 No, there does not need to be an "end" for an infinite sequence in that sequence.
 0 is not "below" the end, but IS the end for the unit fractions, as we can get as close to it as we want with a unit fraction.

1/0 is simply not a unit fraction. Does WM think it is? Not sure. But then, shit happens.... ;^o

 A sequence whose end is not in the sequence doesn't have an end in the sequence.
 

:^)