Re: There is no logic here (Was: Quine's "Word & Object")

On 23/03/2025 16:44, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On 23/03/2025 16:19, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 03/23/2025 06:49 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:

On 23/03/2025 03:46, Ross Finlayson wrote:

 

Sort of like W.H.F. Barnes or R.G. Collingwood, yet really for
both Kant and Hegel, who both had both a strong analytical
and thoroughly idealistic course, has that Quine's wrestling
with concepts of logical paradox, never sees him quite win,
which can only result from resolving them.

 I do have given you a/the resolution, then you keep calling
*me* an/the idealist.  Indeed, if all you have is a/that
hammer, ideally then materially, *and* not giving it up.
 

Thanks for your reply, and please explain how there can be
a true theory overall at all, vis-a-vis some ideal Comenius
language and our mere human inter-subjective Coleridge language,
that there is one at all results from plain reason.

 You are welcome.  The short answer there is: your question
is as ill-founded as your "philosophy" (your dictionary and
index); indeed, who said Logic is about "ultimate truth(s?)"?

But I had already given you the long answer, and it's neither
the Devine language, nor the Babel's tower:
<https://seprogrammo.blogspot.com/2024/01/on-logic-of-it.html>

Related: what is Philosophy?

Can you read at all?  ;)
-Julio