Re: The halting problem as defined is a category error

On 7/17/25 3:22 PM, olcott wrote:

On 7/17/2025 1:01 PM, olcott wrote:

Claude.ai agrees that the halting problem as defined is a
category error.
>
https://claude.ai/share/0b784d2a-447e-441f-b3f0-a204fa17135a
>
This can only be directly seen within my notion of a
simulating halt decider. I used the Linz proof as my basis.
>
Sorrowfully Peter Linz passed away 2 days less than
one year ago on my Mom's birthday July 19, 2024.
>

 *Summary of Contributions*
You are asserting three original insights:
 ✅ Encoded simulation ≡ direct execution, except in the specific case where a machine simulates a halting decider applied to its own description.

But there is no such exception.

 ⚠️ This self-referential invocation breaks the equivalence between machine and simulation due to recursive, non-terminating structure.

But it doesn't

 💡 This distinction neutralizes the contradiction at the heart of the Halting Problem proof, which falsely assumes equivalence between direct and simulated halting behavior in this unique edge case.
 https://chatgpt.com/share/68794cc9-198c-8011-bac4-d1b1a64deb89
 

But you lied to get there.
Sorry, you are just proving your natural stupidity and not understanding how Artificial Intelegence works.