Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s logic |
On Sun, 20 Jul 2025 07:13:43 -0400, Richard Damon wrote:No, it is an introductory statement, backed uo by facts in the next sentence.
On 7/20/25 12:58 AM, olcott wrote:This is an ad hominem attack, not argumentation.Title: A Structural Analysis of the Standard Halting Problem ProofYour problem is you don't understand the meaning of the words you are
>
Author: PL Olcott
>
Abstract:
This paper presents a formal critique of the standard proof of the
undecidability of the Halting Problem. While we do not dispute the
conclusion that the Halting Problem is undecidable, we argue that the
conventional proof fails to establish this conclusion due to a
fundamental misapplication of Turing machine semantics. Specifically,
we show that the contradiction used in the proof arises from conflating
the behavior of encoded simulations with direct execution, and from
making assumptions about a decider's domain that do not hold under a
rigorous model of computation.
>
>
>
using.
/Flibble
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.