Sujet : Re: The halting problem as defined is a category error --- Flibble is correct
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory sci.logic comp.ai.philosophyDate : 19. Jul 2025, 15:42:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <105gase$2pk90$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/18/2025 3:49 AM, joes wrote:
That is wrong. It is, as you say, very obvious that HHH cannot simulate
DDD past the call to HHH. You just draw the wrong conclusion from it.
(Aside: what "seems" to you will convince no one. You can just call
everybody dishonest. Also, they are not "your reviewers".)
For the purposes of this discussion this is the
100% complete definition of HHH. It is the exact
same one that I give to all the chat bots.
Termination Analyzer HHH simulates its input until
it detects a non-terminating behavior pattern. When
HHH detects such a pattern it aborts its simulation
and returns 0.
I have always proved that HHH does simulate itself simulating DDD
https://liarparadox.org/HHH(DDD)_Full_Trace.pdf
I have also always proved that DDD correctly simulated by
HHH cannot possibly reach its own "return" statement final
halt state.
*The following analysis cannot be correctly refuted*
https://chatgpt.com/share/687aa4c2-b814-8011-9e7d-b85c03b291eb-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer