Den 15.06.2025 00:33, skrev Bertitaylor:
These bunglers had no clue that the Earth was actually moving. And so
the equipment on the Earth was moving. This light always travels in
aether greater or lesser distances than marked out. This is a universal
phenomenon. No one can know what the speed is wrt the static solid fine
aether filling the infinite and eternal universe.
If EM-radiation were a wave in an aether, it would be as easy
to measure the speed of Earth relative to the aether,
as it is to measure the speed of an aeroplane relative to the air.
The MMX is the big daddy of such velocity experiments. The light speed
varies with emitter to take care of the extra distances travelled
between any two points of the moving platform. > Which is Earth in our
case. Thus the nulls formed are due to light speed variance and not
light speed invariance.
The MMX shows that the speed of light is isotropic in all
inertial frames.
Waves in a medium are anisotropic in all inertial
frames but the one that is stationary relative to the medium.
So MMX shows that light is not a wave in the aether.
Arindam found this huge bungle back in 2005. Some 20 years ago. As the
physicists are a shameless criminal lot they have ignored Arindam's
discovery.
Quite.
The physics of Arindam Banerjee, employee of a medical research
laboratory, has discovered much new physics.
Complete works in physics by Arindam Banerjee:
https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.bengali/c/mbbPlpsbbxk"The cause of gravity":
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJQuote of the first few statements:
"The formula for universal gravitation is well known to be,
as the force F acting between two masses m and M, parted by
a distance r from their centres of mass, as F=GmM/r^2, where G
is the gravitational constant found by experiment. Recently
the author has updated this formula to F=BnN/r^2 where B is
a constant, and n and N are the number of protons or electrons
in the masses m and M. It is obvious that as n and N are proportional
to m and M, this is essentially the same formula with the difference
that instead of masses, the new formula involves charges. Thus the
gravitational force is expressed electrostatically, as a manifestation
of electrostatic force. In other words, there is no difference between
electrostatic force and gravitational force."
Do you, Bertitaylor, like Arindam, claim that the Sun is exerting
the electrostatic force 3.6e22 N on the Earth?
I bet you will ignore this question. :-D
"The Structure of Heavenly Bodies":
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJQuote about the pressure within the Earth:
"F = G*m*D*pi*4*R/3
Now when R or the radius of the Earth is zero, which is the case
when the m is at the centre of the Earth, then F = 0. Now pressure
is force per unit area, so pressure at the centre of the Earth is
also zero."
Do you, Bertitaylor, like Arindam, claim that the pressure at
the centre of the Earth is zero?
I bet you will ignore this question. :-D
In that case, I will ask again.
I may also quote more genial discoveries from Arindam's papers,
because they are rather entertaining.
-- Paulhttps://paulba.no/
…