Re: The Apollo moon landings

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: The Apollo moon landings
De : vuvsa (at) *nospam* uouluos.ru (Lucus Shalabanov)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Suivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Date : 27. Jun 2025, 10:07:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <103lmvo$23ma$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Bertitaylor wrote:

But there is no such animal as curved spacetime.
 
There is appearance of such with Earth's movement. Like a straight going
wave or particle will have to look bent from the moving platform that is
Earth. That leads to weird stuff like GR which implicitly assumed the
nonsenses of SR such as mass energy equivalence.

same way there is no straight line in empty space. You are the
international jew. And SR is about gravity to energy equivalence, not
mass. You dont undrestand tensors very much.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Jun 25 * Re: The Apollo moon landings9Lucus Shalabanov
28 Jun01:28 `* Re: The Apollo moon landings8Bertitaylor
28 Jun13:31  `* Re: The Apollo moon landings7Oleg Tzeboev
2 Jul01:03   `* Re: The Apollo moon landings6Bertitaylor
2 Jul19:01    `* Re: The Apollo moon landings5Tyller Maksimchikov
2 Jul23:06     `* Re: The Apollo moon landings4Bertitaylor
3 Jul20:09      `* Re: The Apollo moon landings3Luther Makhmutov
3 Jul22:28       `* Re: The Apollo moon landings2Chris M. Thomasson
4 Jul00:11        `- Re: The Apollo moon landings1Bertitaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal