Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know shit.
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 30. Mar 2025, 16:37:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <137de285af1075fd38879770e4639130@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 0:50:18 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>
In 1930 Wolfgang Pauli  proposed the existence of the neutrino (named in
1933 by Fermi) to solve the violation of energy conservation in beta
decay (when a neutron turns into a proton and emits an electron).
Scientists observed that the emitted electrons had varying energies,
rather than a fixed value as expected. The neutrino was ALLEGEDLY
detected experimentally by Cowan and Reines in 1956.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cowan%E2%80%93Reines_neutrino_experiment
"Allegedly"? Is there an alternative explanation for positrons
being created in water close to a nuclear reactor?

....
>
Up to date, the neutinos mass is UNKNOWN.
This is a bit disingenuous.  Neutrino mass is known to be less
than 0.45 eV at 90% confidence: arXiv:2406.13516.

....
>
MY CONCLUSION: Physics needs that neutrinos REALLY EXIST, otherwise the
law of conservation of energy is violated.
Why do you believe that energy is not conserved?  I mean, CoE has been
confirmed consistently in engineering and experimental physics.  Even
so,
most physicists didn't go along with Pauli's hypothesis at the time.
"I have done a terrible thing, I have postulated a particle that cannot
be detected." – Wolfgang Pauli

How neutrinos are generated IS UNKNOWN.
They are generated in nuclear reactions.  What's so unknown about that?

If neutrinos have mass or not IS UNKNOWN.
Logical fallacy. Straw man argument.

Tens of billions of USD wasted for nothing,
What about medicare payments to people 150+ years old?  They're less
detectable than neutrinos :-)

The existence of cosmic neutrinos is essential in astrophysics to
FILL THE VOID in calculations. Also, in cosmology, their role is
essential for such unproven theories like the BB.
When you have a hammer, every problem looks like a nail :-)

I smell a rotten fish around this.
If your fish were frozen in IceCube, it would be sun-tanned with
Cerenkov radiation generated from pieces of atoms suddenly
accelerated to hundreds of keV by ... nothing?

Meanwhile, physicists making six figures plus expenses are more than
happy, and have zero accountability.
>
HOAX!
No one has seen an electron, so radio, tv, radar, computers, cars,
electricity are all HOAXES!

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal