Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.

W dniu 14.01.2025 o 19:02, Python pisze:

Le 14/01/2025 à 18:52, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 14.01.2025 o 18:23, Python pisze:

Le 14/01/2025 à 17:51, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 14.01.2025 o 16:49, Python pisze:

Le 14/01/2025 à 16:42, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
..

Again, how come you are incapable of convincing ANYONE neither here nor elsewhere that your rant is a proper proof of anything?

>
Again - a fanatic idiot can never be convinced
that he is a fanatic idiot, no surprise in
that.

>
All of Humanity but Maciej Wozniak are "fanatic idiots"? You need > medical help, Maciej.

>
Al of humanity comes for  discussing on a
physics newsgroup? You need medical help,
Python.

>
Did you ever confront your "proofs" to anyone outside of here?

>
I confront it with people here and
I can see that apart of spitting,
slandering and desperately dodging
questions they can do exactly nothing
to it. So, sorry, it is good.

 No answer?

Answer. No. Why to explain inconsistency of
your Shit to someone who neither knows it
nor is interested in it?

Did you ever asked yourself, given how short and simple are your "proofs", why NOBODY has proposed your arguments as "proofs" that SR was inconsistent?

 Still no answer.

A lie. Of course

 

That is a simple one. You're selling your
idiocies as a voice of Nature Herself,

 Nope.

Buhahahahahahahahaha.
The impudence of your lies is amazing.

Still no answer again. And still you consider all of Humanity since Einstein (and since Newton/Galileo too) as idiots compared to you, a random wannabee engineer whining and ranting from an asylum in Poland. Come on!

Still mistakig yourseflf together with some
brainwashed fellow idiots with Humanity.
Don't you feel how  unrealistic this is?
This is the reason  I suggest  that you
seek for medical help.  You suffer from
delusion or grandeur.

Both refutation an meaningful arguments are,
unfortunately, just some delusion of yours.
Samely as being "all of humanity".

>
Did you ever consider that, maybe, maybe you are too stupid and/or too stubborn to seriously consider these arguments?

>
No. Do you?

 I did

No you didn't. An impudent lie, as usual.

As an engineer (a real one, not a wannabee as you)

slander
noun [ C or U ]
uk  /ˈslɑːn.dər/ us  /ˈslæn.dɚ/
a false spoken statement about someone that damages their reputation, or the making of such a statement:
I concluded

that your argument are utterly asinine and tried to explain you how and why. Again definitely not "screaming NOOO!" which is what YOU are doing.

Definitely, screaming "NOOOOO!!!", spitting
and slandering. You're unable for anything
else, sorry, poor stinker. And your fellow
idiots are no better.

 No answer to this either:
 Have you heard about Andrew Wiles proof of Fermat theorem in the 90x? Do you have the expertise to evaluate the validity of this alleged proof? Do you think that this alleged proof is valid (considering that it has been reviewed and revised afterward)?

I've heard a bit, very little, I'm not
especially interested in and I have no
opinion whether it is valid or not.