Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.logic sci.mathDate : 04. Aug 2024, 17:48:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <99c651b2-13f9-416e-bcf4-3f94f0768c7a@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/4/2024 10:36 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 08/03/2024 10:25 PM, Jim Burns wrote:
On 8/3/2024 11:51 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 08/03/2024 08:45 PM, Jim Burns wrote:
What does 'comprehension' mean where there are no sets?
>
What can you think it means.
>
Your rhetoric suggests that
_you_ don't have something in mind for the term
_you_ introduced,
and you'd like someone else to provide something
to have in mind. Please prove me wrong.
>
What does 'comprehension' mean where there are no sets?
>
Specifically,
what does 'expansion of comprehension' mean
in the context of
"geometry, axiomatic geometry or Euclid's"?
>
No, "what can you think", it means.
>
Usually it just means "construction".
Okay. Then you did answer my question.
"Comprehension", "construction" and "what can you think"
each seem to me very different from the other two.
I will let you carry on doing what it is you are doing.
…