Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.logic sci.mathDate : 03. Aug 2024, 15:23:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <F6pqEi9Vg1YMcYTcIPQNs6NU_vI@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 02/08/2024 à 19:06, Jim Burns a écrit :
(0,x] inherits from its superset (0,1] properties by which,
for ⅟ℕᶠⁱⁿ∩(0,x] finite.unit.fractions in (0,x]
each non.{}.subset is maximummed, and
each finite.unit.fraction is down.stepped, and
each finite.unit.fraction in is non.max.up.stepped.
Therefore,
the finite.unit.fractions in ⅟ℕᶠⁱⁿ∩(0,x] are ℵ₀.many.
∀ᴿx > 0: NUFᶠⁱⁿ(x) = ℵ₀
I recognized lately that you use the wrong definition of NUF.
Here is the correct definition:
There exist NUF(x) unit fractions u, such that for all y >= x: u < y.
Note that the order is ∃ u ∀ y.
NUF(x) = ℵ₀ for all x > 0 is wrong. NUF(x) = 1 for all x > 0 already is wrong since there is no unit fraction smaller than all unit fractions. ℵ₀ unit fractions need ℵ₀*2ℵ₀ points above zero.
Regards, WM