Sujet : Re: A correct prediction
De : r.hachel (at) *nospam* wanadou.fr (Richard Hachel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 26. Jun 2024, 15:11:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <RicLx9KvWO-WaQhnISNxCYkh0js@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 26/06/2024 à 15:08,
hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
Wozzie's simpleton mind can't fathom that X and Y need
not have any relation to each other since he didn't
specify what X and Y were.
After all, he didn't specify that b was Y and not X, etc.
X might be "A bird flew in the window" and Y might be "A
cockroach ate my cheese." Both may be true, both may be
false, or X may be true while B false or B may be true
while A false. Or they may be indeterminate because the
events were neither observed nor recorded.
How?
Python is one of the top posters on science forums?
And I didn't know it?
I thought he was a buffoon, a puppet.
But he is unable to understand what an apparent speed is in physics, and why such a speed can take on all values from zero to infinity as it approaches.
He's a puppet, a buffoon.
You must probably be wrong.
R.H.