Sujet : Re: A correct prediction
De : hitlong (at) *nospam* yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 26. Jun 2024, 14:08:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <cd2a95827b5447e27773a6561233def4@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
W dniu 25.06.2024 o 20:08, Python pisze:
>
Le 25/06/2024 à 19:15, Athel Cornish-Bowden a écrit :
>
Let's try to put it in terms that Wozzie can understand:
>
:-) Good luck with that!
>
Oh, stinker Python is opening its muzzle again,
and trying again to pretend he knows something.
He knows much more than Wozzie, the nano-dynamite brain.
And again he can't answer a simplw question.
Of course.
Wozzie's simpleton mind can't fathom that X and Y need
not have any relation to each other since he didn't
specify what X and Y were.
After all, he didn't specify that b was Y and not X, etc.
X might be "A bird flew in the window" and Y might be "A
cockroach ate my cheese." Both may be true, both may be
false, or X may be true while B false or B may be true
while A false. Or they may be indeterminate because the
events were neither observed nor recorded.