Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.logicDate : 18. Nov 2024, 15:29:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <f7fab959-0408-49c1-8e1c-d93e389e3021@tha.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 18.11.2024 10:58, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-11-17 12:46:29 +0000, WM said:
There are 100 intervals for each natural number.
This can be proven by bijecting J'(100n) and J(n). My intervals are then exhausted, yours are not.
Irrelevant.
Very relevant.
In mathematics unproven claims do not count.
Geometry is only another language of mathematics. The relative covering 1/5 of my intervals for every finite translation of every finite number of intervals and the analytical limit of the constant sequence 1/5 is mathematical proof that Cantor erred.
Don't you know analytical limits?
Regards, WN
…