Sujet : Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.
De : clzb93ynxj (at) *nospam* att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 31. May 2025, 21:44:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <fd67be5bdeeb7f9a15ebd084a809f800@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Sat, 31 May 2025 19:01:59 +0000, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
On 5/31/2025 8:01 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
Den 31.05.2025 16:33, skrev rhertz:
On Sat, 31 May 2025 4:44:04 +0000, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
>
On 5/30/2025 7:31 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>
>
Didn't you know that it is experimental evidence
that determines the validity of a theory?\
>
Paul, only idiots as incompetent as you
are can believe such a nonsensical lie.
>
>
In science, deductive reasoning is used to test hypotheses, where a
general rule or theory is applied to a specific situation to see if the
prediction holds true.
>
I note with interest that Richard Hertz and Maciej Woźniak
agree that it is plain wrong that experimental evidence determines
the validity of a theory of physics.
>
As said: only idiots as incompetent as you
are can believe such a nonsensical lie.
>
Paul is really mistaken here because the validity of a theory depends on
its derivation. An invalid derivation doesn't predict anymore than
astrology does. The prediction of a doubling of the Newtonian is not
valid. It does not predict.