Re: The first postulate is a truism.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: The first postulate is a truism.
De : clzb93ynxj (at) *nospam* att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity
Date : 23. Jun 2025, 14:32:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <ffad851d0e1e9c9a4d0d8d1b07c72965@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 11:25:52 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:
>
On 2025-06-19 17:37:29 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said:
>
Perplexity:
>
"The First Postulate of Special Relativity
>
Statement of the First Postulate
>
The first postulate of special relativity, also known as the principle
of relativity, states:
>
    The laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of
reference."
>
>
"truism
/?tr?iz?m/  n. a statement that is obviously true and says nothing new
or interesting. —truistic/tr?istik/ adj." -Oxford American.
>
The first postulate is not a truism. It is possible to imagine a world
where it is not true and to believe that we actually live in a such
world.
>
Applying 'truism' to postulate is a category error anyway,
(but what do we expect from dear Laurence?)
>
Jan
Speaking of category errors, why didn't Einstein make his first
postulate:
"The laws of electromagnetism are the same in all frames of reference."
OR
"The equations of electromagnetism must be adjusted for multiple frames
of reference."
OR
"Without an aether we can use the Galilean transformations for light."

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal