Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.

Am Dienstag000003, 03.06.2025 um 19:44 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden:

I have actually (carefully!!) 'tested' that particular paper and found,
that it is FULL of errors.
>
The number of errors (plus others issues like violation of formal
standards, missing references, bad language..) was so large (400+), that
I personally think, that Einstein was wilfully mocking the audience.

>
The audience didn't think so.
Au contraire, it was an instant succes,
among those who mattered.
Prestigeous univerisities starten trying to get Einstein
to accept a professorship.
>

>
>
I have looked at that paper very carefully and wrote about 428 comments
about statements, which were in many cases wrong.

>
Ah, some insight into yourself.

 Alas, probably not. Thomas Heger has never understood the way commas are used in English and how it differs from how they are used in German. So although he is saying (probably correctly) that most of his 428 comments are wrong, he probably thinks he was saying that many of Einstein's statements were wrong, which is just his fantasy.

I don't think, that most of my comments were wrong, but that some of them could be wrong.
Sure: commas in English are used differently from their use in German and I have to admit some errors in this realm.
But you certainly don't want to argue with my comma setting errors.
This would be simply unfair, because I'm writing in a second language.
And I would see you writing in German (with correct spelling and grammar, of course).

Although I have tended to think that he's not quite at the level of LaurenceClarkCrossen or Maciej Wozniak as a crackpot, I am beginning to think that he is.

All 'dissidents' are called 'nuts' or crackpots'.
This is common behavior here and elsewhere.
But this doesn't dis-prove any single one of my comments.
...
TH