Re: Replacement of Cardinality

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.logic
Date : 30. Jul 2024, 18:37:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <nhZZyv1rDmL90pLuaDma-8md3qw@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 30/07/2024 à 03:18, Richard Damon a écrit :
On 7/29/24 9:11 AM, WM wrote:

But what number became ω when doubled?
 ω/2
 No, that is w double, what number in the first set became w?
 
>
Every natural number when doubled is a Natural Number.
 No.
 Why not? WHich ones don't?
 ω/2 and larger.
 
 
Note, ω-1 doesn't exist in the base transfinite numbers, just as -1 doesn't exist in the Natural Numbers, you can't go below the first element.
 If all natural numbers exist, then ω-1 exists.
 Why?
Because otherwise there was a gap below ω.

That is unavoidable. You believe in the magical appearance of infinitely many unit fractions. That breaks logic and mathematics.
 Nope,
∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0. Note the u niversal quantifier.
Regards, WM

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Dec 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal