Re: Replacement of Cardinality

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.logic
Date : 31. Jul 2024, 15:27:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Nemoweb
Message-ID : <rHIaB-dFODVqSY7-aRnf4ItTyG0@jntp>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : Nemo/0.999a
Le 31/07/2024 à 03:28, Richard Damon a écrit :
On 7/30/24 1:37 PM, WM wrote:
Le 30/07/2024 à 03:18, Richard Damon a écrit :
On 7/29/24 9:11 AM, WM wrote:
 
But what number became ω when doubled?
 ω/2
 And where is that in {1, 2, 3, ... w} ?
In the midst, far beyond all definable numbers, far beyond ω/10^10.
 The input set was the Natural Numbers and w,
ω/10^10 and ω/10 are dark natural numbers.
If all natural numbers exist, then ω-1 exists.
>
Why?
 Because otherwise there was a gap below ω.
 But you combined two different sets, so why can't there be a gap?
I assume completness.

∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0. Note the universal quantifier.
 Right, so we can say that ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n > 1/(n+1), so that for every unit fraction 1/n, there exists another unit fraction smaller than itself.
No. My formula says ∀n ∈ ℕ.
 Remember, one property of Natural numbers that ∀n ∈ ℕ: n+1 exists.
Not for all dark numbers.
Regards, WM

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Dec 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal