Sujet : Re: Langevin's paradox again
De : relativity (at) *nospam* paulba.no (Paul.B.Andersen)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativityDate : 16. Jul 2024, 20:31:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v76hh2$1d5jc$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Den 16.07.2024 20:56, skrev Richard Hachel:
Le 16/07/2024 à 20:28, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>
Den 16.07.2024 15:25, skrev Richard Hachel:
. .
They will still be if we ask Terrence's own time between the two crossings.
Tr=To.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)=24/9 years (or 8/3)
. .
Hence Tr=24/9 years for her too (or 8/3).
. .
So your theory predicts that Stella and Terrence ages equally.
>
According to SR Stella's proper time is τₛ ≈ 2.19722 years.
>
So "the travelling twin" ages less than the "stay at home twin".
>
The ageing of the twins in the "twin paradox" is experimentally verified to be as predicted by SR.
>
Your theory is falsified.
This is what I keep repeating to relativistic physicists, who can read what I write on usenet (but I don't think they are interested).
Right.
I am not interested.
You have answered my question and showed that the predictions
of your "theory" are different from the predictions of SR.
I am not interested in your obviously inconsistent
theory which give predictions which are not in accordance
with reality.
-- Paulhttps://paulba.no/
…