Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.logic sci.mathDate : 07. Aug 2024, 00:46:33
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v8uckp$1u85n$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/6/2024 2:02 PM, Moebius wrote:
Am 06.08.2024 um 22:21 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
On 8/6/2024 6:33 AM, Moebius wrote:
Am 06.08.2024 um 04:24 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
>
There are infinite[ly many] even[ numbers] and
there are infinite[ly many] odd[ numbers].
>
On the other hand, some even numbers are odd. :-)
>
;^D 666?
>
Ahh zero. I think its even... ;^)
>
1, 2, 3, 4, ...
>
odd, even, odd, even, ...
>
So, the pattern:
>
-2, -1, 0, 1, 2
>
even, odd, (even), odd, even
Yes. An integer z is even, iff there is am integer k such that z = 2k.
Clearly for z = 0 there is an integer k (namely 0) such that z = 2k.
In other words, an integer z is even if it can be deviede by 2 "without a remainder =/= 0".
Clearly 0 can be devided by 2 "without a remainder =/= 0": 0 / 2 = 0.
So 0 is an odd even number? :-)
I say even? Well, both (odd and even) at the same time? This makes me think of signed zero...
+0
-0
and just, 0?
(-2)->(-1)->(-0+)->(+1)->(+2)
? ;^)
so going from -2, -1, -0 means we got to zero from the negative side.
+2, +1, +0 means we got to zero from the positive side.
0 is just zero?
-0+ ? wtf! ;^)