Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : invalid (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Moebius)
Groupes : sci.logic sci.mathDate : 09. Aug 2024, 01:14:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v93n0s$b7a2$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 08.08.2024 um 19:13 schrieb Jim Burns:
On 8/7/2024 3:01 PM, WM wrote:
Le 07/08/2024 à 20:29, Jim Burns a écrit :
On 8/7/2024 1:47 PM, WM wrote:
The only part of your argument which you've shared is
∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0
>
That is the decisive part.
Never two or more unit fractions are added to NUF.
you (WM) find silence with regard to
the rest of your argument
more advantageous, apparently.
>
There is no rest.
I am finding it difficult to imagine you (WM)
as a student of physics.
You were a student of physics, right?
Actually, he was a professor of physics (sort of)! :-)
⎛ <teacher>
⎜ How long does it take the polar bear
⎜ to slide down the frictionless ice.slope?
⎜
⎜ <Wölfchen>
⎜ 37 seconds.
⎜
⎜ <teacher>
⎜ Please show your work.
⎜
⎜ <Wölfchen>
⎝ 37 seconds, you idiot.
?
No, I just can't see it.
You silly idiot, can't you comprehend the significance of
∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0
?! (!!!)
Hint: WM never really *studied* mathematics ... you see.
…