Re: Replacement of Cardinality

Am 08.08.2024 um 19:13 schrieb Jim Burns:

On 8/7/2024 3:01 PM, WM wrote:

Le 07/08/2024 à 20:29, Jim Burns a écrit :

On 8/7/2024 1:47 PM, WM wrote:

 

The only part of your argument which you've shared is
∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0

>
That is the decisive part.
Never two or more unit fractions are added to NUF.

 

you (WM) find silence with regard to
the rest of your argument
more advantageous, apparently.

>
There is no rest.

 I am finding it difficult to imagine you (WM)
as a student of physics.
You were a student of physics, right?

Actually, he was a professor of physics (sort of)! :-)

⎛ <teacher>
⎜ How long does it take the polar bear
⎜ to slide down the frictionless ice.slope?
⎜
⎜ <Wölfchen>
⎜ 37 seconds.
⎜
⎜ <teacher>
⎜ Please show your work.
⎜
⎜ <Wölfchen>
⎝ 37 seconds, you idiot.
?
 No, I just can't see it.

You silly idiot, can't you comprehend the significance of
     ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0
?! (!!!)
Hint: WM never really *studied* mathematics ... you see.