Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.logicDate : 13. Nov 2024, 17:14:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vh2j89$29gco$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 13.11.2024 11:39, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-11-12 13:59:24 +0000, WM said:
Cantor said that all rationals are within the sequence and hence within all intervals. I prove that rationals are in the complement.
He said that about his sequence and his intervals. Infinitely many of them
are in intervals that do not overlap with any of your J(n).
The intervals J(n) = [n - 1/10, n + 1/10] cover the relative measure 1/5 of ℝ+. By translating them to match Cantor's intervals they cover ℝ+ infinitely often. This is impossible. Therefore set theorists must discard geometry.
Further all finitely many translations maintain the original relative measure. The sequence 1/5, 1/5, 1/5, ... has limit 1/5 according to analysis. Therefore set theorists must discard analysis.
Regards, WM
…