Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.logicDate : 26. Nov 2024, 12:07:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vi4a6c$3dt4s$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 26.11.2024 10:09, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-11-25 14:38:13 +0000, WM said:
The simple example contradicts a bijection between the two sets described above.
What does "contradicts a bijection" mean?
It shows that the mapping claimed to be a bijection is not a bijection.
Regards, WM
…