Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.logicDate : 11. Dec 2024, 01:25:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vjam6d$1700v$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
WM <
wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> wrote:
On 10.12.2024 13:19, Richard Damon wrote:
The pairing is between TWO sets, not the members of a set with itself.
The pairing is between the elements. Otherwise you could pair R and Q by
simply claiming it.
"The infinite sequence thus defined has the peculiar property to contain
the positive rational numbers completely, and each of them only once at
a determined place." [Cantor] Note the numbers, not the set.
Regards, WM
The pairing of the elements of *TWO* sets, like R and Q or N and the set of
elements of N that are 0 mod 10.
TWO different sets, not the elements of a set and some of the elements of
that same set.
Sorry, you are just proving that you logic is based on LIES.
…