Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.logicDate : 12. Dec 2024, 22:57:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vjfm7v$2upa9$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12.12.2024 14:59, joes wrote:
What Richard meant: do not confuse the set being mapped with the one being
mapped onto.
I don't. D = {10n | n ∈ ℕ} is the set being mapped. The set D being mapped does not change when it is attached to the set ℕ being mapped in form of black hats.
Regards, WM
…