Re: Muon paradox

Tom Roberts wrote:

So consider other experiments that ARE "convincing" (in the sense you
mean). In particular, Bailey et al. They put muons into a storage ring
with a kinetic energy of 3.1 GeV. They measured the muons' kinetic
energy, their momentum, their speed around the ring, and their rate of
decay. All measurements are fully consistent with the predictions of SR.
(They also measured the muon g-2, which was the primary purpose of the
experiment; confirming SR was just a side issue.)
 
Bailey et al, Phys. Lett. B 55 (1975) 420-424

this is blatantly incorrectuous. They never know how many muons are there,
due quantum probability distribution. So your assumed energy makes no
sense. Not even for detection.