Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.logic sci.mathDate : 29. Jul 2024, 10:28:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <265d9172-862d-47f1-85f3-726738c70631@att.net>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/28/2024 8:04 PM, Moebius wrote:
Am 27.07.2024 um 19:34 schrieb Jim Burns:
On 7/26/2024 12:31 PM, WM wrote:
_The rule of subset_ proves that [bla bla bla]
>
Where did Mückenheim get this "rule" from?
Any source?
Mückenheim is wishcasting.
The rule is that no sets are infiniteⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ.
The counter.argument is the roster of
the usual suspects: ℕⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ ℤⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ ℚⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ ℝⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ
It's underwhelming.
And yet,
his rule is better exposition than I can recall,
out of years of much.the.same,
to himself of his own thinking.
Perhaps one old dog can teach himself one new trick?