Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.logic sci.math
Date : 30. Jul 2024, 19:18:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <305754ad-bf86-44e7-95a5-f6059b8869da@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/29/2024 9:31 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 07/29/2024 02:12 PM, Jim Burns wrote:
On 7/29/2024 3:44 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 07/29/2024 05:32 AM, Jim Burns wrote:
On 7/28/2024 7:42 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

about ubiquitous ordinals
>
What are ubiquitous ordinal?
>
Well, you know that ORD, is, the order type of ordinals,
and so it's an ordinal, of all the ordinals.

Is a ubiquitous ordinal a finite ordinal?
I would appreciate a "yes" or a "no" in your response.

The ubiquitous ordinals are, for example,
a theory where the primary elements are ordinals,
for ordering theory, and numbering theory,
which may be more fundamental, than set theory,
with regards to a theory of one relation.
Apparently,
what you mean by ubiquitous ordinals are ordinals,
without further qualification.
Ordinals can be represented as sets, and are,
most often by the von Neumann scheme, λ = [0,λ)ᴼʳᵈ
Apparently,
ubiquitous ordinals are
what are represented by the [0,λ)ᴼʳᵈ
Ordinals are well.ordered.
The [0,λ)ᴼʳᵈ are well.ordered.
That is entirely non.accidental.
There isn't much reason to choose between
the von Neumann ordinal.representations and
the raw, unfiltered "ubiquitous" ordinals.
The one advantage which
representations have over the ubiquitous(?) is that
they are are objects in a theory of sets which
we have great confidence isn't contradictory,
and that extends our great confidence to
the non.contradictoriness of theorems about ordinals.
Unless we are considering their existence,
which is to say, their non.contradictoriness,
ordinals.of.unspecified.origin are well.ordered,
and that's an end to their description.

It's like the universe of set theory,
>
Do you and I mean the same by "universe of set theory"?
>
I am most familiar with theories of
  well.founded sets without urelements.
>
In the von Neumann hierarchy of hereditary well.founded sets
V[0] = {}
V[β+1] = 𝒫(V[β])
V[γ] = ⋃[β<γ] V[β]
>
V[ω] is the universe of hereditarily finite sets.
>
For the first inaccessible ordinal κ
V[κ] is a model of ZF+Choice.
>
For first inaccessible ordinal κ
[0,κ) holds an uncountable ordinal and
  is closed under cardinal arithmetic.

There is no universe in ZFC, don't be saying otherwise.
I will continue not.saying that
there is a universe _IN_ ZFC.
There are universes _OF_ ZFC which are also called domains.
V[κ] is one of the domains of ZFC.
None of the sets described by the theory is
the universal set, holding all sets IN the domain.
Not precisely to your point, but interesting:
Some of the sets IN ZFC satisfy all its axioms,
which make them also domains OF ZFC
Compare that to the way in which
each end.segment of ℕ is also a model of ℕ

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Jul 24 * Re: Replacement of Cardinality876Jim Burns
28 Jul 24 +* Re: Replacement of Cardinality866WM
28 Jul 24 i`* Re: Replacement of Cardinality865Jim Burns
29 Jul 24 i +* Re: Replacement of Cardinality33Ross Finlayson
29 Jul 24 i i`* Re: Replacement of Cardinality32Ross Finlayson
29 Jul 24 i i `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality31Ross Finlayson
29 Jul 24 i i  `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality30Jim Burns
29 Jul 24 i i   `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality29Ross Finlayson
29 Jul 24 i i    +- Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals, integer continuum, linear continuum, continuity)1Ross Finlayson
29 Jul 24 i i    `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality27Jim Burns
30 Jul 24 i i     `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)26Ross Finlayson
30 Jul 24 i i      +- Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)1Ross Finlayson
30 Jul 24 i i      `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)24Jim Burns
30 Jul 24 i i       `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)23Ross Finlayson
30 Jul 24 i i        +- Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)1Ross Finlayson
31 Jul 24 i i        `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)21Jim Burns
1 Aug 24 i i         `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)20Ross Finlayson
1 Aug 24 i i          `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)19Jim Burns
1 Aug 24 i i           `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)18Ross Finlayson
2 Aug 24 i i            `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)17Jim Burns
2 Aug 24 i i             `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)16Ross Finlayson
2 Aug 24 i i              +- Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)1Jim Burns
2 Aug 24 i i              +* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)13FromTheRafters
2 Aug 24 i i              i`* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)12Ross Finlayson
3 Aug 24 i i              i `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)11Jim Burns
4 Aug 24 i i              i  `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)10Ross Finlayson
4 Aug 24 i i              i   `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)9Jim Burns
4 Aug 24 i i              i    `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)8Ross Finlayson
4 Aug 24 i i              i     `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)7Jim Burns
4 Aug 24 i i              i      `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)6Ross Finlayson
4 Aug 24 i i              i       `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)5Jim Burns
4 Aug 24 i i              i        `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)4Ross Finlayson
4 Aug 24 i i              i         `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)3Jim Burns
4 Aug 24 i i              i          `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)2Ross Finlayson
4 Aug 24 i i              i           `- Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)1Jim Burns
2 Aug 24 i i              `- Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)1Jim Burns
29 Jul 24 i +* Re: Replacement of Cardinality830WM
29 Jul 24 i i`* Re: Replacement of Cardinality829Jim Burns
30 Jul 24 i i `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality828WM
30 Jul 24 i i  `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality827Jim Burns
31 Jul 24 i i   +* Re: Replacement of Cardinality13Moebius
31 Jul 24 i i   i+* Re: Replacement of Cardinality --- infinitesimal number system11olcott
31 Jul 24 i i   ii+* Re: Replacement of Cardinality --- infinitesimal number system6Moebius
31 Jul 24 i i   iii`* Re: Replacement of Cardinality --- infinitesimal number system5olcott
31 Jul 24 i i   iii +- Re: Replacement of Cardinality --- infinitesimal number system1Chris M. Thomasson
31 Jul 24 i i   iii `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality --- infinitesimal number system3Moebius
31 Jul 24 i i   iii  `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality --- infinitesimal number system2olcott
31 Jul 24 i i   iii   `- Re: Replacement of Cardinality --- infinitesimal number system1Moebius
31 Jul 24 i i   ii+* Re: Replacement of Cardinality --- infinitesimal number system3FromTheRafters
31 Jul 24 i i   iii+- Re: Replacement of Cardinality --- infinitesimal number system1olcott
31 Jul 24 i i   iii`- Re: Replacement of Cardinality --- infinitesimal number system1Ross Finlayson
31 Jul 24 i i   ii`- Re: Replacement of Cardinality --- infinitesimal number system1Jim Burns
31 Jul 24 i i   i`- Re: Replacement of Cardinality1WM
31 Jul 24 i i   `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality813WM
31 Jul 24 i i    `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality812Jim Burns
1 Aug 24 i i     `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality811WM
1 Aug 24 i i      `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality810Jim Burns
1 Aug 24 i i       +- Re: Replacement of Cardinality1Moebius
2 Aug 24 i i       `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality808WM
2 Aug 24 i i        `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality807Jim Burns
2 Aug 24 i i         +* Re: Replacement of Cardinality23Moebius
3 Aug 24 i i         i`* Re: Replacement of Cardinality22WM
3 Aug 24 i i         i +* Re: Replacement of Cardinality4joes
4 Aug 24 i i         i i`* Re: Replacement of Cardinality3WM
4 Aug 24 i i         i i `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality2Jim Burns
4 Aug 24 i i         i i  `- Re: Replacement of Cardinality1Moebius
3 Aug 24 i i         i `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality17Chris M. Thomasson
3 Aug 24 i i         i  +* Re: Replacement of Cardinality14FromTheRafters
4 Aug 24 i i         i  i`* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (real-valued)13Ross Finlayson
4 Aug 24 i i         i  i `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (real-valued)12FromTheRafters
4 Aug 24 i i         i  i  `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (real-valued)11Ross Finlayson
4 Aug 24 i i         i  i   `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (real-valued)10Ross Finlayson
4 Aug 24 i i         i  i    `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (real-valued)9Ross Finlayson
4 Aug 24 i i         i  i     +* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (real-valued)3Ross Finlayson
4 Aug 24 i i         i  i     i+- Re: Replacement of Cardinality (real-valued)1Ross Finlayson
4 Aug 24 i i         i  i     i`- Re: Replacement of Cardinality (real-valued)1Ross Finlayson
7 Aug 24 i i         i  i     `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (real-valued)5Jim Burns
8 Aug 24 i i         i  i      `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (real-valued)4Ross Finlayson
8 Aug 24 i i         i  i       `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (real-valued)3Jim Burns
8 Aug 24 i i         i  i        `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (real-valued)2Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i i         i  i         `- Re: Replacement of Cardinality (real-valued)1Ross Finlayson
4 Aug 24 i i         i  `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality2Moebius
4 Aug 24 i i         i   `- Re: Replacement of Cardinality1WM
3 Aug 24 i i         `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality783WM
3 Aug 24 i i          `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality782Jim Burns
4 Aug 24 i i           +* Re: Replacement of Cardinality43Moebius
4 Aug 24 i i           i`* Re: Replacement of Cardinality42WM
4 Aug 24 i i           i +* Re: Replacement of Cardinality4Jim Burns
4 Aug 24 i i           i i+* Re: Replacement of Cardinality2Moebius
4 Aug 24 i i           i ii`- Re: Replacement of Cardinality1Jim Burns
4 Aug 24 i i           i i`- Re: Replacement of Cardinality1WM
5 Aug 24 i i           i `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality37Chris M. Thomasson
5 Aug 24 i i           i  `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality36Moebius
5 Aug 24 i i           i   +* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (quantifier disambiguation)5Ross Finlayson
5 Aug 24 i i           i   i`* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (quantifier disambiguation)4Ross Finlayson
5 Aug 24 i i           i   i `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (quantifier disambiguation)3Jim Burns
5 Aug 24 i i           i   i  `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality (quantifier disambiguation)2Ross Finlayson
13 Aug 24 i i           i   i   `- Re: Replacement of Cardinality (quantifier disambiguation)1Ross Finlayson
5 Aug 24 i i           i   +* Re: Replacement of Cardinality4Chris M. Thomasson
5 Aug 24 i i           i   i`* Re: Replacement of Cardinality3Moebius
5 Aug 24 i i           i   i `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality2Moebius
5 Aug 24 i i           i   `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality26WM
4 Aug 24 i i           `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality738WM
29 Jul 24 i `- Re: Replacement of Cardinality1Moebius
29 Jul 24 `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality9Moebius

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal