Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)

On 8/4/2024 2:38 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 08/04/2024 11:26 AM, Jim Burns wrote:

On 8/4/2024 1:44 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

And it's rather presumptious of you to not
make what is equi-interpretable to be equi-interpretable.
>
Jaded, say, biased, willfully ignorant, hypocritical, ...,
"wrong".

>
It is not wrong, when talking about certain things,
to not.be.talking about other things.
It is not wrong, it is not possible to do otherwise.
>
There is no pair of integers in the ratio of √2
>
To say that
there are pairs of reals in the ratio of √2
does not argue against the first claim,
because they are claims about different things.
>
To pretend that it argues against the first claim
is wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

>
Numbers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number
It is not wrong, when talking about certain numbers,
to not.be.talking about other numbers.
It is not wrong, it is not possible to do otherwise.