Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.logic sci.mathDate : 14. Aug 2024, 20:04:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v9iv3c$iiv3$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/13/2024 3:09 PM, Moebius wrote:
Am 13.08.2024 um 23:54 schrieb Jim Burns:
On 8/13/2024 3:21 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 8/13/2024 7:27 AM, WM wrote:
Le 12/08/2024 à 20:34, Jim Burns a écrit :
On 8/12/2024 9:47 AM, WM wrote:
>
Before the bound there is the end,
perhaps dark.
>
0 is
greatest.lower.bound β of visibleᵂᴹ unit.fractions
>
Yes. But the smallest unit fractions comes before.
>
This irks me a bit.
The smallest unit fractions?
How do you define them?
What if
your version of "small" is _larger_ than
somebody else's version of "small"?
Is hyper small smaller than super small?
>
"It depends".
>
Note that super.duper small is
between hyper.small and super.small.
>
OMG.small and WTF.small are left as
an exercise for the reader.
You've forgotten about "extra small" (XS).
oh my... Humm... What about the good ol' Super Extra Extra Small? (SEES)? ;^D
Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Re: Replacement of Cardinality