Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : invalid (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Moebius)
Groupes : sci.logic sci.mathDate : 19. Aug 2024, 18:17:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v9vune$2unef$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 19.08.2024 um 18:58 schrieb Jim Burns:
You got it totally wrong!
The dark unit fractions are smaller than the (all) visible ones.
Now: The visible unit fraction don't have a smallest one (of course), but the dark unit fraction do (at least in mückenmath)!
WM: "Dark unit fractions have a smallest element."
See?!
WM: "Visible unit fractions have the [or rather *a*] lower bound 0."
Right, but the dark unit fractions ARE BETWEEN 0 and all the visible unit fractions.
See:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinitesimaland:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperreal_numberWM: "No smaller [dark] unit fractions [than the smallest one] is existing, because no larger [dark] natnumber {than the largest one] is existing."
Right!