Re: Muon paradox

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Muon paradox
De : riii (at) *nospam* mmaajlzt.es (Willilam Gutiérrez Xian)
Groupes : sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Suivi-à : sci.physics.relativity sci.math
Date : 15. Apr 2025, 10:13:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vtl7vr$3cbfl$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.4
J. J. Lodder wrote:

    Bailey et al, Phys. Lett. B 55 (1975) 420-424
 
this is blatantly incorrectuous. They never know how many muons are
there, due quantum probability distribution. So your assumed energy
makes no sense. Not even for detection.
 
Au contraire, it is you who are 'blatantly incorrectuous', [sic]
and you obviously have no idea of what you are talking about.
It is easy to measure how many muons there are in the storage ring at
any given moment, by picking up their electromagnetic fields, Jan

au contraire yourself, which also reveals you dont capisce how phisics are
done in laboratories. If you think those particles are immune for quantum
probability distribution, you are fooling yourself. Also, once you tap
that electromagnetic field, that's already invasive, so essentially
destroy that particle.

learn advanced physics, me friendo..

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Apr 25 o Re: Muon paradox1Willilam Gutiérrez Xian

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal